DPIIT & Kerala Startup Mission Recognised · Enterprise LIMS at Indian prices — from ₹9,999/month
Audit Ready System

Compliance is Non-Negotiable

Most of what a standard asks for is evidence. ErgoLIMS is built so that evidence accumulates while the work happens — and so that changing it later leaves a mark. Built around ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and 21 CFR Part 11, with the boundaries stated on each page.

ISO/IEC 17025:2017
Full clause coverage §4–§8
21 CFR Part 11
Electronic records & signatures
ALCOA+ Principles
Attributable, contemporaneous, original
GLP Guidelines
Good Laboratory Practice
ICH Q1A(R2)
Stability framework — coming soon
GMP Annex 1
Env. monitoring — coming soon
FSSAI Rules
Food safety compliance
GDPR / DPDP
Data subject rights & deletion
Clause Mapping

ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — Clause by Clause

Each clause below names the feature that holds its records. Coverage isn’t uniform — §7 and §8 go deepest, and the ISO 17025 page says where it stops.

§4

General Requirements

Impartiality policy enforced via RBAC
Confidentiality — data never crosses tenant boundaries
Multi-tenant isolation at database query level
§5

Structural Requirements

Org chart with department hierarchy
Signatory management per department
Role-based authority levels (Analyst → HOD → Lab Director)
§6

Resource Requirements

Personnel competency & training records
Instrument calibration with auto-lockout
Reference material CRM/RM register with traceability
Subcontractor management (§6.6)
§7

Process Requirements

Sample registration & Chain of Custody (§7.4)
Method validation records — LOD/LOQ, linearity, recovery (§7.2)
Measurement uncertainty budgets — GUM/top-down (§7.6)
QC charts (Levey-Jennings), OOS Phase 1 & 2 (§7.7)
COA with QR verification, amendments (§7.8.8)
§8

Management System

Document control — SOP versioning Draft→Effective→Obsolete (§8.3)
Non-conformance & CAPA management (§8.5)
Internal audits with finding lifecycle (§8.7)
Management review records with action tracking (§8.9)
Complaints management (§7.9)
FDA Electronic Records

21 CFR Part 11 — Electronic Records & Signatures

FDA's gold standard for electronic records. Required for pharmaceutical and food labs operating under GMP.

Electronic Records

All entries timestamped, attributed, and stored immutably.

E-Signatures

Identity challenge with printed name, date, time, and meaning of signature.

Audit Trail

Captures WHO, WHEN, OLD VALUE, NEW VALUE, REASON for every change.

System Access Controls

Role-based permissions, session expiry, brute-force lockout.

Operational Controls

Authority checks prevent unauthorized result approval.

Record Protection

AES-256-GCM encryption at rest, soft-delete with recovery.

SEC_MODULE_01

Immutable Audit Trails

The "Black Box" of your lab. Every click, edit, and deletion is recorded. Enforced by PostgreSQL triggers — the trail is written at the database layer, so it cannot be edited away by the application. Who changed result 10.5 to 10.4? Why? When? Captured instantly.

audit_log.json

"event": "RESULT_MODIFIED",

"old_val": 10.5, "new_val": 10.4,

"user": "analyst_01",

"reason": "Transcription error corrected",

"timestamp": "2024-10-27T10:30:00Z"

RBAC_L5

Strict RBAC

Analysts enter data. HODs review. Lab Directors sign off. Strict segregation of duties — no analyst can approve their own result.

AES_256

Data Sovereignty

Your data belongs to you. AWS Mumbai Region for SaaS (Indian data residency). On-premise available for complete isolation. AES-256-GCM encryption at rest.

AUTO_PREV

Active Non-Conformance Prevention

Most LIMS just record errors. ErgoLIMS prevents them. The system physically blocks result entry if:

  • Selected instrument calibration is expired
  • Reagent batch is past expiry date (FEFO enforced)
  • Analyst is not trained/authorized for this specific test method
  • OOS result lacks mandatory deviation remark
Data Privacy

GDPR & India DPDP — built on, not bolted on

The infrastructure a privacy programme depends on — who can see what, how long data is kept, and proof nothing was altered afterwards — ships today. The dedicated console for handling individual subject requests is on the roadmap, and is labelled as such below rather than folded into the rest.

Role-based access control
Available
Who can see personal data is governed by the same 239-permission catalogue as the rest of the platform.
Versioned retention & legal holds
Available
How long data is kept is a policy, with approval and dry-run, that can be placed on hold for an investigation.
Immutable audit trail
Available
Every access-relevant change is on a database-trigger-enforced trail that the application cannot alter or delete.
Data subject request console
Coming soon
A dedicated screen for right-to-erasure, portability export and consent-basis tracking as a single per-request workflow.
Breach notification workflow
Coming soon
Automated alerting and an incident log purpose-built for data-breach events.